RAPAPORT… LVMH plans to countersue Tiffany & Co. after the companies’ $16 billion marriage turned sour, accusing the US jeweler of management errors during the coronavirus.
“[Tiffany’s] first-half results and its perspectives for 2020 are very disappointing, and significantly inferior to those of comparable brands of the LVMH group during this period,” LVMH said Thursday. “LVMH will be therefore led to challenge the handling of the crisis by Tiffany’s management and its board of directors.”
The crisis constitutes a “material adverse effect” that allows LVMH to renege on the deal, the luxury giant argued. Tiffany also made unusual decisions during the period, such as distributing substantial dividend despite incurring losses, it continued.
“The operation and organization of this company are not substantially intact,” LVMH claimed.
LVMH pulled out of its takeover of Tiffany on Wednesday, citing a Franco-American trade dispute. Tiffany then sued its former suitor in Delaware to force it to go ahead with the deal — an action the French group described as “unfounded” and “defamatory.”
Tiffany’s core claim was that LVMH had stalled the transaction by intentionally delaying applications for antitrust clearance, seemingly so it could buy time to renegotiate the price in light of the pandemic.
But LVMH said it could demonstrate to the court that this was incorrect, and noted that it would file for antitrust approval in Brussels in the coming days. It expects to obtain clearance in October, it added.
Tiffany’s sales fell 29% year on year to $747.1 million in the second fiscal quarter ending July 3, while net earnings dropped 77% to $31.9 million. The retailer recorded a first-quarter loss.
Image: The Tiffany flagship store in New York. (Shutterstock)
Tiffany Messed Up During Covid-19, LVMH Says
The Bottom Line
- LVMH claims Tiffany's first-half 2020 results and outlook were significantly worse than comparable LVMH brands, citing management errors during the pandemic.
- Tiffany distributed substantial dividends despite losses, which LVMH argues reflects poor crisis handling and justifies terminating the acquisition.
- Tiffany sued LVMH to enforce the takeover, alleging intentional delays in antitrust approvals, but LVMH denies this and plans to seek approval in Brussels.
Summary by Rapaport AI
More Stories

Namibia Authorities Investigate Allegations About Corruption in Diamond Sector
Brilliant Star denies activist’s allegations about it; De Beers terminates company’s sight following separate review.

Shai Schnitzer Becomes Third Generation of Family to Head IDE
His grandfather, Moshe Schnitzer, and father, Shmuel Shnitzer, both served as president.

Romanov Sapphire Sails Past Estimate to Score $5M at Sotheby’s
Auction house originally predicted Cartier bracelet would bring in up to $2 million.
