Mughal Magnificence
This unique piece, created some time in the early seventeenth century, comprises a center diamond weighing approximately 28 carats and four other stones, each weighing approximately 15 carats to 20 carats. Each diamond is set within a gold bezel that follows the irregular shape of the stone, and each suspends a carved Colombian emerald drop. The drops are believed to have been added some 200 years later. According to Katherine Prior, author of Maharajas’ Jewels, the center diamond is the largest table cut known to have survived. Bonham’s notes that the five diamonds have existed together in the same setting for centuries; although the setting is later than the diamonds, it, too, has a Mughal feel.
Examined within their mounts by John King, chief quality officer of the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) laboratory in New York, the diamonds have never been unmounted. “These diamonds were considered to bring power from the gods because of their optical properties and their hardness. It is very rare to find large pieces of this shape,” he says. The stones are thought to have been either macles, which occur in thin segments, requiring very little polishing, or cleavages, which have a grain like wood, allowing them to be cleaved off the rough. These stones show no inclusions, says King. “We grade half a million diamonds over a carat per year. One one-hundredth of 1 percent would fall into this category.”
The polishing of these stones amazes the experts. Even under high magnification, King says, “We did not see any polishing lines. We don’t know how they got such a fine polish,” using seventeenth-century techniques.
Further, King adds, although “the fabled diamonds from India were usually type II — the benchmark for limpid, very clear diamonds — examination of these stones revealed a significant amount of nitrogen, proving they are type I. Most diamonds from Golconda that we have tested are type I.”
The diamonds are faceted around the edge. “The facets help protect the piece and do allow a little more light back into the stone,” King notes. No one knows how this necklace escaped the royal Indian rush to modernize their gems into nineteenth- and twentieth-century settings. Through wars and upheavals, through loss of power and wealth, most of the magnificent Mughal jewels were broken up, the stones re-cut to reflect modern tastes and cutting skills. It is nothing short of a miracle that this necklace survived, with these five amazing diamonds in their original setting.
More From Rapaport Magazine

What Does Love Look Like? Not Out-of-Touch Lab-Grown Messaging
The natural-diamond industry won’t attract couples by telling them synthetics devalue their relationship.

Bridal Shopping in the Age of AI
Couples are researching online, but they still want to make the ring purchase personal – and that creates opportunities.

Six Brands Serving Fresh Engagement-Ring Designs
Whether it’s hand-sculpted organic gold or reimagined divorce jewels, these designers are setting trends that resonate with bridal shoppers.
